OrtoOptymist

Client

OrtoOptymist

Scope

Research, prototype, Webflow build

Year

March to December 2023

Role

Product Builder

A private orthodontics and orthopedics practice that was always fully booked, entirely by word of mouth, with a website nobody visited before calling. OrtoOptymist wanted a younger audience, a sharper brand and a site that could do some of the selling. I led the research, the brand adjustments, the prototype and a Webflow build, inside one budget and one very firm rule.

Every brief has two lists. Here are both.

  • A site built around patients' needs, with a captivating and purposeful journey
  • To stand out from every other clinic in the city and stay future-proof
  • Marketable, unique, inviting: something they could actually promote
  • Appeal to teenagers and young adults without losing their parents
  • Showcase the doctors' expertise and make reception's day easier
  • No public online booking through a calendar. Appointments by phone or email only, full stop
  • No new brand. Subtle adjustments to the identity they already had
  • No budget growth, even when the wishlist grew. That constraint shaped the build
7Interviewed patients who had visited the site before booking
0Appointment capacity, filled by word of mouth alone
0Months, March to December 2023
0User groups, and five personas to match
0Specialties untangled: orthodontics and orthopedics
0Zoom at which the prototype stays readable

OrtoOptymist had a very good problem: a full appointment book. But every one of those bookings came from a recommendation, and not a single interviewee had looked at the website before calling. The site wasn't losing patients. It just wasn't earning any, and with a rebrand aimed at teenagers and young adults, it needed to start.

Three pain points, three moves.
Tap a pain point to see the move
What the competition did better

Direct and indirect competitors, judged on first impressions, interaction, visual design and content. The audit was uncomfortable in a useful way.

  • A more professional, more responsive visual presentation
  • A clearly defined brand identity, consistent from page to page
  • A marketable, well-defined user flow that leads somewhere
So the priorities wrote themselves
1Intuitive navigation
2A captivating user journey
3A look and feel built for the intended audience

The research sorted everyone around the clinic into five groups, and each group became a person with a problem statement. Meet them.

Needs

Because

So the site

The old site listed everything the clinic does in one long column, teeth and knees together. Untangle it: drag each service into its specialty, or tap a service and then a column.

OrthodonticsTeeth, bite, smile
OrthopedicsBones, joints, movement

Four phases over ten months, with one pivot in the middle that made the budget work. Step through them.

Problem definition and prioritization

Rather than treating every research finding as equally important, I consolidated and prioritized problems by user impact, business value and frequency.

Key pain points
  • Users struggled to find pricing and procedure information.
  • Orthodontic and orthopedic content was difficult to distinguish.
  • Excessive text increased cognitive load.
  • The website did not effectively communicate the clinic's expertise.
  • The digital experience was not sufficiently differentiated from competitors.
Three product priorities
  • Simplify navigation. Help users quickly understand where they are and where to go next.
  • Create a purposeful customer journey. Move from an information-heavy website to an experience that supports discovery, trust and action.
  • Reposition the digital brand. A contemporary visual language that better reflects the clinic and resonates with its audience.
Product strategy

Research showed users on both desktop and mobile, so a responsive strategy was set from the start rather than treating mobile as a secondary experience. I translated the findings into a new information architecture organised around user intent, separating services and content into clearer journeys. The goal was to reduce cognitive load while keeping the most important information immediately accessible.

Ideation and prototyping

Low-fidelity wireframes let me explore several approaches to navigation, content hierarchy and the key user journeys before anything was polished.

What wireframing let us do
  • Explore alternative information architectures
  • Prioritize high-value content
  • Identify unnecessary interactions
  • Validate the placement of key functionality
  • Align stakeholders before investing in high-fidelity design

The concepts were then translated into high-fidelity prototypes and iterated through stakeholder feedback and usability considerations.

Product and business trade-offs

The owners explicitly did not want public online calendar booking; appointments would continue by phone or email. Rather than forcing a conventional booking model onto the product, I designed the experience around the existing operational model and made the contact pathways clearer and easier to reach.

The best solution was not the feature-richest one. It was the one that aligned user needs with operational reality.
Implementation

Given the scope, timeline and budget, I evaluated the options and selected Webflow. Starting from an existing Webflow foundation and adapting it substantially to the content architecture, visual identity and functionality defined in discovery let the team deliver a polished experience while keeping effort in line with the resources available.

Accessibility and scalability

Accessibility ran through the whole design process: readability, contrast, responsive behaviour and content hierarchy. The site follows WCAG 2.1 principles, adds text enlargement and contrast controls, and was tested across desktop and mobile breakpoints at magnification up to 200%. The content structure is built to grow without the architecture being rebuilt.

Outcome

The project turned an information-heavy website into an intentional product experience built around user needs and business objectives.

  • Clearer information architecture
  • More intuitive navigation
  • Stronger separation between service categories
  • Improved access to high-intent information
  • A more distinctive, contemporary brand experience
  • Better alignment between user expectations and business goals
  • Responsive experience across devices
  • Accessibility built into the product
  • A scalable foundation for future digital growth

Most importantly, the project showed that the core challenge was never visual design alone. Combining user research, product strategy, business constraints, prioritization, UX and implementation is what let the website become a real part of the customer journey and a stronger business asset.

Teenagers on phones and parents on laptops, plus WCAG 2.1 as the floor. The prototype stays readable at 200% zoom and hands people their own text-size and contrast controls. Try them on this sample procedure page.

Orthodontics › Fixed braces
Fixed braces
Braces straighten teeth over 12 to 24 months, with a check-up every six weeks. The first consultation is free and the full treatment price is listed below and confirmed at your visit. Book by phone or email.
See prices →Book a visit →

Four things this project taught me about working with a client who knows exactly what they want. Open them.

Clients reach their goals when they can see the whole road, not just the next step. Showing the process and the outcome in detail, early, is what gives them the confidence to commit.

Sometimes a client prefers their own solution over the UX advice they hired you for. Opinions rarely settle it. Results from user testing do, because they show which solution actually works instead of who is more sure.

The wishlist will grow and the budget will not. Agreeing what is in and what is out on day one is the difference between a healthy pivot, like the Webflow template, and a project that quietly doubles.

Clients are eager to see the finished product and tempted to skip the parts that don't look like progress. Talking through why each step exists keeps everyone on the same page, and keeps the research from being the first thing cut.

Research and testing
Stakeholder interviewsUser interviewsCompetitive auditPersonasProblem statementsUsability testingOptimal WorkshopMiroZoom
Design
Information architecturePaper wireframesDigital wireframesPrototypingInteraction designResponsive designAccessible designGraphic designMotion graphicsFigmaSketchAdobe XDPhotoshopIllustratorInDesignAfter EffectsAffinity suiteDaVinci Resolve
Build and delivery
WebflowHTMLCSSStakeholder managementScope and budget managementTeam leadershipMarket strategy